Our methodology combines investigative journalism, data analysis, and forensic accounting to expose corruption and drive accountability.
Every investigation follows a rigorous methodology designed to ensure accuracy, fairness, and impact. From initial tip to published report, we verify every claim through multiple independent sources.
Gathering information from public records, FOI requests, and confidential sources
Cross-referencing data and validating claims through multiple sources
Identifying patterns, connecting networks, and quantifying impact
Providing those accused with opportunity to respond before publication
Making findings accessible to journalists, citizens, and oversight bodies
We cast a wide net to gather information from diverse sources, ensuring we have a comprehensive picture before drawing conclusions.
We verify every claim through multiple independent sources. A single source is never sufficient for publication.
Every factual claim must be confirmed by at least two independent sources, preferably from different categories (e.g., documents + human source).
Documents are checked for authenticity through metadata analysis, cross-referencing with official databases, and expert review when necessary.
Numerical data is verified against official sources, statistical anomalies are investigated, and calculations are independently validated.
Complex technical matters are reviewed by subject matter experts—accountants, engineers, lawyers—to ensure accurate interpretation.
Raw data becomes evidence through systematic analysis that reveals patterns, connections, and the scale of corruption.
We follow the money through:
We identify connections between:
We use data to reveal:
We quantify the consequences:
Before publication, we contact all individuals and organizations featured in our investigations, providing them an opportunity to respond to specific allegations.
Our goal is maximum appropriate impact. We publish findings in accessible formats and work with partners to ensure investigations reach the right audiences.
Searchable database of cases, documents, and data available at platform.corrupty.com
Long-form articles on corrupty.com/blog with full context, evidence, and analysis
Collaborations with journalists and news organizations for broader reach
Direct sharing with NGOs and advocacy groups who can drive accountability
Formal notifications to audit offices, anti-corruption agencies, and parliamentary committees
We rely on authoritative, verifiable sources for all investigations
Modern investigations require modern tools
Python, R, SQL for analyzing large datasets, identifying anomalies, and modeling relationships
Network mapping tools, geographic information systems, and interactive charts to make data understandable
Encrypted messaging, secure file transfer, and anonymous tip systems to protect sources
OCR for scanning documents, metadata extraction, and automated redaction for sensitive information
Every investigation undergoes multiple layers of review before publication to ensure accuracy, fairness, and legal compliance.
Another investigator reviews the evidence, methodology, and conclusions independently
Senior editors assess clarity, fairness, and newsworthiness
Attorney evaluates defamation risk and ensures compliance with journalism law
Dedicated fact-checker verifies all claims, sources, and citations
We protect sources and investigate credible tips. Your information could expose wrongdoing and drive accountability.